Legal Opinion

Dutch Pantry, Inc. v. Shaffer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 28, 1959No. Appeals, 140 and 141PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bok,

Preliminary objections have been sustained in both of these cases, and since the legal principles are the same and only the pleaded facts differ somewhat, we will consider them together.

It should be made clear at the outset that the scope of our review is narrowed to the question of whether or not summary judgment was proper. The law is plain that such disposition should be made, especially when it has the effect of putting the plaintiff out of court, only in cases that are clear and free from doubt: London v. Kingsley, 368 Pa. 109; 81 A. 2d 870 (1951); Adams v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. London v. KingsleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Adams v. SpeckmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Hartman v. CohnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. KoolVent Metal Awning Corp. of America v. PriceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Thomson-Porcelite Co. v. HaradSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Biggans v. FogliettaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Chambers v. Todd Steel Pickling, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Quality Weaving Company v. ReganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Shepherd v. General Telephone & Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API