Legal Opinion

St. Louis, Fort Scott & Wichita Railroad v. Grove

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1888PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Fh'ror from Harper District Court. On September 4, 1885, J. Paul Gh'ove brought this action against The St. Louis, Fort Scott & Wichita Railroad Company, to recover the sum of $400 alleged to be due him as a retainer, and for certain legal services performed by him for the company in sixteen different actions in matters arising out of condemnation proceedings of land in Harper county, taken for right-of-way in building the railroad of the company.

Read the full summary

Fh'ror from Harper District Court. On September 4, 1885, J. Paul Gh'ove brought this action against The St. Louis, Fort Scott & Wichita Railroad Company, to recover the sum of $400 alleged to be due him as a retainer, and for certain legal services performed by him for the company in sixteen different actions in matters arising out of condemnation proceedings of land in Harper county, taken for right-of-way in building the railroad of the company. The petition among other things alleged: “4. That for said employment and retainer as aforesaid, defendant agreed and contracted with plaintiff to…

1Opinion of the Court

*734The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

This was an action brought by J. Paul Grove against the St. Louis, Fort Scott & Wichita Kailroad Company to recover $400, the value of his services as an attorney, in being retained and in attending to sixteen condemnation cases which were at one time pending in the district court of Harper county. The railroad company answered by a general denial to the petition.

A large part of the brief of the attorneys for the railroad company discusses alleged errors of the court in rejecting and admitting testimony, and in instructing the jury. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nesbit v. HinesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  2. Atlantic & Pacific Rld. v. ReisnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. Stevens v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Manross v. Uncle Sam Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  2. City of Kansas City v. CullinanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. Roniger v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Bare v. FordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  5. Schwartz v. MeschkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API