Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Meschke

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 6, 1914No. 18,928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Clay district court; Sam Kimble, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

Plaintiffs were real-estate agents and brought this action to recover a commission for procuring an exchange of defendant’s stock of merchandise for farm property. The trial to a jury resulted in a verdict in favor of plaintiffs. The defendant appeals and complains that the trial court erred in excluding testimony and in refusing to instruct in reference to double agency. The answer precludes such a defense. If the defendant desired to raise the issue of illegality or fraud or that the contract was improper he should have affirmatively…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clark v. SpencerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  2. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  3. Marley v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1867
  4. Davis v. McCrocklinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  5. St. Louis, Fort Scott & Wichita Railroad v. GroveSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harris v. ConwaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  2. Northwest Land & Colonization Co. v. AddingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. H. H. Woodsmall & Co. v. SteeleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API