Legal Opinion

TigerGraph, Inc. v. Peak

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 21, 2020No. 4:20-cv-05489Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TIGERGRAPH, INC., Case No. 20-cv-05489-PJH 8 Plaintiff, 9 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION TO 10 BRENDON PEAK, TRANSFER VENUE 11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 9 12 13 14 Before the court is defendant Brendon Peak’s (“defendant”) motion to dismiss and, 15 in the alternative, motion to transfer venue. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for 16 decision without oral argument. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered 17 their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API