Legal Opinion

McLendon v. Balkcom

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 13, 1950No. 17108PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) 1. It was alleged that the prisoner was insane at the time the habeas corpus proceedings were instituted and therefore could not be legally executed. Code § 27-2601 provides: “No person who has been convicted of a capital offense shall be entitled to any inquisition or trial to determine his sanity.” Also Code § 27-2602 provides: “Upon satisfactory' evidence being offered to the Governor that the person convicted of a capital offense has become insane subsequent to his conviction, the Governor may, within his discretion, have…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Solesbee v. BalkcomSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. McLendon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  3. Aldredge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Fleming v. LowrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  5. Smith v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCorquodale v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. McLendon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  3. McBurnett v. BalkcomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API