Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Stowers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 9, 1965No. 40721PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

The question to be determined in this appeal is whether the road here involved has been traveled continuously by the public adversely to the record landowner for at least the prescriptive period so as to constitute it a public road.

The action from which this appeal arises was initiated by defendants in error against plaintiffs in error. Our continued reference to the parties is as they appeared in the trial court.

In their petition plaintiffs alleged that the road here involved traversed defendants’ property; that such was “a public ■dedicated road by prescription”; that it…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Norman v. SmedleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. McCrory v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Messinger v. MessingerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. LloydSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nisbet v. Midwest Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  2. Brown v. MayfieldCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. MANAR v. WESSONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
  4. In re the Estate of DillingCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. MANAR v. WESSONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API