Legal Opinion

MANAR v. WESSON

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 8, 2016No. 113,310PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KENNETH L. BUETTNER, Vice-Chief Judge and Presiding Judge.

T1 Defendants/Counter-Claimants/Appellants/Counter-Appeliees James H. and Jamie Wesson appeal from judgment finding Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants/Appellees/Counter-Appellants Floyd and Margie M. Manar have an easement by prescription to use a roadway crossing property owned by the Wes-sons. The Manars appeal the trial court's finding that the road is not a public road. The clear weight of the evidence shows the road was not dedicated to public use nor was there prescription of the way byg the public when it was a wagon trail; we…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Story v. HefnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  2. Birdsey v. KosienskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  3. Irion v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Friend v. HolcombeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  5. Johnson v. WhelanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. MANAR v. WESSONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API