Legal Opinion

Cleland v. Clark

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1900PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Muskegon; Russell, J. Rill by Daniel Cleland against John H. Clark, Mary Clark, Charles Carpenter, Harriet Carpenter, George Newville, Lena Newville, and Isaac Manchester in aid of execution. From a decree for complainant, subject to the equities of certain defendants, he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMoobe, J.

This proceeding was commenced by a bill filed in aid of an execution. The complainant obtained a judgment against John H. Clark, and caused a levy to be made upon land in which he claimed Clark had an interest. He also claimed that Clark had fraudulently conveyed away some of the land, and he asked to have the conveyances set aside, and that he might be allowed to-sell the land free from said conveyances. The circuit judge made a decree to the effect that 40 acres of said land, when the levy was made, was occupied by Clark as a homestead, and was exempt from levy and sale upon execution, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ripley v. SeligmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Cole v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Canal Bank v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Peters v. CartierMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Miller v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. New River, Holston & Western Railroad v. HonakerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916
  2. Bradford v. SchmuckerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  3. Reuck v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Tyler v. BurgesonMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Standifer v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API