Canal Bank v. Hudson
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAR FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE' UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatchford
The litigation involved in this appeal is a continuation of that which was before .this court in Bank v. Partee, 99 U. S. 325. The plaintiffs in the suit were appellants then and are appellants now. The original bill was filed April 1st, 1873, in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Mississippi, by the appellants, as creditors of Sarah D. Partee and William B. Partee, her husband, to secure to them the benefit of a deed of trust executed by the debtors to one Bowman, covering lands in Yazoo County, Mississippi, the object of the deed being to provide for the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Green v. BiddleSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Fish v. HowlandNew York Court of Chancery · 1828
- Bright v. BoydU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1841
- Putnam v. RitchieNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
- Loder v. . HatfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Sutton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Armstrong v. AshleySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Sunter v. SunterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- City of Coral Gables v. Certain Lands Upon Which Taxes Are DelinquentSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Craig v. HarrahNevada Supreme Court · 1949
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.