Legal Opinion

Klein v. Yellow Cab Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided December 9, 1944No. Civil Action No. 22328PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, District Judge.

The motion for physical examination of the plaintiff is controlled by Civil Rule 35(a), which provides that the Court may order plaintiff to submit to a physical examination, for good cause shown. The plaintiff alleges this accident resulted in serious injury to his pelvis, groin, genital organs, and bladder, and involving permanent injury to the urethra, prostate gland, *170and sexual function. He objects to examination by the defendant’s surgeon, which would include cystoscopy, pylegrams, and so forth, as too painful, and as carrying with it the probability of serious or…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dziwanoski v. Ocean Carriers Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1960
  2. Lucke v. LuckeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In re Certain Asbestos CasesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1986
  4. Nomina v. EggemanPutnam County Court of Common Pleas · 1962
  5. State Ex Rel. Hess v. HenryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API