Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty Co. v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 24, 1991No. 87-09537; CA A60904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Continental Porsche Audi (employer) seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that claimant is entitled to an award of attorney fees under ORS 656.262(10) 1 and ORS 656.382(1), 2 because employer failed to comply with the time requirements for discovery. We reverse.

Claimant was injured in April, 1985. The claim was closed in August, 1985, by a determination order that awarded no permanent disability. The claim was reopened for an aggravation claim and was again closed by a determination order, issued on April 10, 1987, that awarded claimant 20 percent unscheduled…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Stimson Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Randall v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. Morgan v. Stimson Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tri-Met, Inc. v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Boehr v. Mid-Willamette Valley FoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. SAIF Corp. v. CondonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Tri-Met, Inc. v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API