Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Condon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 14, 1993No. 91-00585; CA A74780Published

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

SAIF seeks judicial review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order awarding attorney’s fees under ORS 656.382(1). We reverse.

On November 30, 1989, claimant began treatment for depression resulting from a compensable injury to his lower back. SAIF was notified of the treatment on December 21, 1989. However, SAIF did not issue an acceptance within 90 days of notification. In an August 13, 1990, telephone conversation, SAIF advised claimant’s psychiatrist that psychiatric treatment was a part of the accepted low back claim. SAIF paid all the bills for that treatment.

Claimant requested a hearing,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Aetna Casualty Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API