Chicago Title Insurance v. Kumar
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, C.J.
By its action in the Land Court, the plaintiff sought: (1) a determination pursuant to G. L. c. 185, § 1 (k), that there is no cloud on, or unmarketability of, the defendant’s title to a parcel of land in Chelmsford; and (2) a declaration pursuant to G. L. c. 231 A, § 1, that a policy of title insurance issued by the plaintiff to the defendant does not afford coverage against a claim arising out of a previous grantor’s failure to record a notice as required by the Massachusetts Hazardous Waste Management Act, G. L. c. 21C, § 7. A judge of the Land Court determined, on cross-motions for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hocking v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
- United States v. Allied Chemical Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1984
- Sperling v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
3Cited by21 opinions
- Somerset Savings Bank v. Chicago Title InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Chicago Title Insurance v. Investguard, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Rood v. Commonwealth Land Title InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Lick Mill Creek Apartments v. Chicago Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Dave Robbins Construction, LLC v. First American Title Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.