Legal Opinion

Chicago Title Insurance v. Kumar

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 13, 1987PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, C.J.

By its action in the Land Court, the plaintiff sought: (1) a determination pursuant to G. L. c. 185, § 1 (k), that there is no cloud on, or unmarketability of, the defendant’s title to a parcel of land in Chelmsford; and (2) a declaration pursuant to G. L. c. 231 A, § 1, that a policy of title insurance issued by the plaintiff to the defendant does not afford coverage against a claim arising out of a previous grantor’s failure to record a notice as required by the Massachusetts Hazardous Waste Management Act, G. L. c. 21C, § 7. A judge of the Land Court determined, on cross-motions for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hocking v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
  2. United States v. Allied Chemical Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1984
  3. Sperling v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Somerset Savings Bank v. Chicago Title InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  2. Chicago Title Insurance v. Investguard, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Rood v. Commonwealth Land Title InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Lick Mill Creek Apartments v. Chicago Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Dave Robbins Construction, LLC v. First American Title Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API