Legal Opinion

Haninger v. Haninger

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1982No. 82AP-55PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhiteside, P.J.

Defendant-appellant, Margaret B. Haninger, appeals from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County, Division of Domestic Relations, denying her motion for an increase in alimony and raises a single assignment of error, as follows:

“The trial court erred in refusing to grant relief to the defendant by increasing the monthly sustenance alimony payment.”

The trial court adopted findings recommended by a referee to whom the matter was referred and entered an order denying an increase in alimony. The findings include the following:

“1. At the time of the original decree in 1972,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Klause v. Thompson (In Re Klause)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1995
  2. Leighner v. LeighnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Bingham v. BinghamOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Russell v. RussellOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Barrows v. Barrows, Unpublished Decision (9-15-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API