Haninger v. Haninger
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWhiteside, P.J.
Defendant-appellant, Margaret B. Haninger, appeals from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County, Division of Domestic Relations, denying her motion for an increase in alimony and raises a single assignment of error, as follows:
“The trial court erred in refusing to grant relief to the defendant by increasing the monthly sustenance alimony payment.”
The trial court adopted findings recommended by a referee to whom the matter was referred and entered an order denying an increase in alimony. The findings include the following:
“1. At the time of the original decree in 1972,…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Klause v. Thompson (In Re Klause)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1995
- Leighner v. LeighnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
- Bingham v. BinghamOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Russell v. RussellOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Barrows v. Barrows, Unpublished Decision (9-15-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.