Leighner v. Leighner

In his appeal from an order of the trial court overruling his motion for an order terminating the requirement that he pay sustenance alimony of $1,500 per month to plaintiff, defendant raises two assignments of error:

“I. The court erred in refusing to terminate alimony on the basis of changed circumstances.

“II. The court erred in refusing to follow the law as it pertains to an alimony recepient’s [sic] responsibility to secure remunerative employment commensurate with their [sic] skills and abilities.”

Because the assignments of error are interrelated, we will combine them for purposes of…