Legal Opinion · Dissent
Harris v. Croce
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 11, 2007No. E040674Published
1Dissent
RAMIREZ, P. J., Dissenting.
Today the majority holds that the trial court erred when it ordered that respondent Louise Croce (Croce) obtain the amount of $239,129.54 by writ of execution against appellant Sydney Lowe Harris (Harris), with directions that she forward any amounts so obtained to her judgment creditors, the Munarettos, within two weeks of any payment. It concludes that this was error because the trial court was first required to perform a factual analysis under title 11 United States Code section 523(a)(15), and remands the case to the trial court to engage in that examination.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Gilbert G. BEEZLEY, Debtor. Gilbert G. BEEZLEY, Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- JRS Products, Inc. v. Matsushita Electric Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Gionis v. Wayne (In Re Gionis)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Bardis v. OatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.