Legal Opinion

Taffet v. Southern Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 6, 1991No. Nos. 90-7088, 90-8452PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Circuit Judge:

In both of these class actions, the plaintiffs appeal the district courts’ grant of defendants’ motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).1 These appeals require us to address issues of first impression in this Circuit, including the applicability of the clear statement doctrine, Burford abstention, the primary jurisdiction doctrine, and the filed rate doctrine to suits by consumers against state-regulated utilities. We reverse the district courts and remand for trials on the merits.

I.…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Linder v. PortocarreroCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Wegoland Ltd. v. NYNEX Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  3. Linder v. PortocarreroCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Taffet v. Southern Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Wegoland Ltd. v. Nynex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API