Legal Opinion

Belhumeur v. Labor Relations Commission

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 4, 1991PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The plaintiff teachers have challenged the amount and validity of the agency service fees charged to them by the unions that represent them for collective bargaining purposes. This appeal relates to one aspect of that challenge. We allowed the plaintiffs’ petition for direct appellate review.

Each plaintiff argues, as a nonunion member obliged to pay a “service fee” (G. L. c. 150E, § 12 [1990 ed.]), that his or her First Amendment rights have been violated because no independent auditor has certified to the correctness of the allocation of chargeable and nonchargeable expenses, on the basis of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Chicago Teachers Union, Local No. 1 v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lehnert v. Ferris Faculty Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. School Comm. of Greenfield v. Greenfield Educ. Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Howard K. Andrews v. Education Association of CheshireCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. White v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. Belhumeur v. Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. Wareham Education Ass'n v. Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. EllisMassachusetts Superior Court · 1998
  5. Sheridan v. Intern. Broth. Electrical Workers, Local 455District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API