Legal Opinion
Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. v. Honea
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 18, 2010No. 1081688PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STUART, Justice.
Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. (“Raymond James”), and Bernard Mi-chaud, a securities broker at Raymond James (hereinafter referred to collectively as “RJFS”), appeal the judgment of the Jefferson Circuit Court vacating an arbitration award entered in their favor and against Kathryn L. Honea, a former client. We reverse and remand.
I
Beginning in May 1997, Honea opened multiple investment accounts at a branch office of Raymond James in Birmingham. In conjunction with the opening of the accounts, Honea signed a client agreement with Raymond James containing the following…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Nafta Traders, Inc. v. QuinnTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. United Industrial, Service, Transportation, Professional & Government Workers of North America Seafarers International Union ex rel. BasonSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
- Honea v. Raymond James Fin. Servs., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
- Katz, Nannis & Solomon, P.C. v. LevineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- Cavalier Manufacturing, Inc. v. GantSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.