Tyco Fire Products L.P. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
RESTANI, Judge:
Tyco Fire Products L.P. (“Tyco”) appeals a U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) ruling that Tyco’s products — filled bulbs 1 it uses in fire sprinklers and water heaters — are classified under Chapter 70 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”), as articles of glass. 2 Tyco contends in its motion for summary judgment that the goods should be classified within Chapter 84, as parts of certain machines. Tyco asserts that its goods are properly classified under Heading 8419 or 8424 3 because the liquid compound inside the glass,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Lynteq, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tyco Fire Products L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Atlas Power LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2026
- Infantino, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Target Gen. Merch., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2025