Tyco Fire Products L.P. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Judge:
In its second motion for summary judgment, Tyco Fire Products L.P. (“Tyco”) once again contends that its products, filled glass bulbs, should be classified under Chapter 84 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”), as parts of either fire sprinklers or water heaters. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) originally determined, and Defendant the United States (“the government”) continues to argue in its second cross-motion for summary judgment, that the products are properly classified under Chapter 70, as articles of glass. After denying…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Woodland Trust v. Flowertree Nursery, Inc. And Ivy J. WinslettCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Lynteq, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Libas, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tyco Fire Products, Ltd Partnership v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016