Legal Opinion
Emery v. Wal-Mart Super Center No. 576
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided May 28, 1999No. 92,257, 92,258PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
CAROL M. HANSEN, Presiding Judge:
{1 Petitioner, Dennis Emery (Claimant) seeks review of a Workers Compensation Court order denying his claim for compensation because he had failed to meet his burden of persuasion.
12 Claimant filed two separate claims alleging compensable injury while working for Respondent, Wal-Mart (Employer) - The first was filed in November 1997, claiming cumulative trauma injury to both feet. The second, filed May 1, 1998, alleged cumulative trauma injury to his back. The claims were consolidated in the Workers' Compensation Court for purposes of trial.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnson v. Board of Governors of Registered DentistsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Jackson v. Oklahoma Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- American Management Systems, Inc. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Harder v. F.C. Clinton, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Bittman v. Boardman Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lujan v. St. Mary's HospitalCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
- Neel v. American Woodmark Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
- Emery v. Wal-Mart Super Center No. 576Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
- Mapp v. Stand-By PersonnelCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999