Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hastings v. Rose Courts

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 23, 1963No. 5-3074PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.

This is a boundary line dispute involving property in Lots 1 and 2 of Eapley Estate in Pulaski County. Rose Courts, Inc., an Arkansas corporation, owns the east portion of Lot 2; and Harry L. Hastings and wife1 own the west portion of Lot 1. Eunning north and south between Lots 1 and 2 there ivas and is an unopened avenue 40 feet wide, east to west, and the lots of the litigants herein abut on said unopened avenue. Eose Courts brought this suit against Hastings to have the Chancery Court establish the true location of the unopened 40-foot avenue, and also to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Russell v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Robertson v. EvansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  3. Missouri Pac. R.R. Co., Thompson, Trustee v. McGuireSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. Gosnell Special School District No. 6 v. BaggettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  5. Gordon v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wells v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Turner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  3. Wells v. HeathSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Mason v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Crooked Creek, III, Inc. v. City of GreenwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API