Legal Opinion
Graffam v. Geronda
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided April 27, 1973PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POMEROY, Justice.
This appeal followed the entry of judgment for the plaintiff by a Justice of the Superior Court. The case originated in a District Court which had jurisdiction of the subject matter and the parties. Judgment was there entered for the plaintiff.
We sustain the appeal.
The facts are not in dispute.
The plaintiff was a wholesale dealer of oil products. Defendant was the operator of a snowmobile raceway. Sometime in December of 1969 the plaintiff delivered 500 cases of oil to the defendant.
The defendant argued in the District Court that the transaction was a consignment, not a sale.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Frost v. LuceySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
- Reville v. RevilleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- Wiggin v. SanbornSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1965
- Fuller v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1910
- Young v. JonesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1875
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Scholl v. TallmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Estate Landscape & Snow Removal Specialists, Inc. v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
- Marton Remodeling v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. NotisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Stultz Electric Works v. Marine Hydraulic Engineering Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.