Legal Opinion
Martin v. Brock
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided September 18, 2001No. 92,573PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rehearing Opinion by
JOE C. TAYLOR, Judge.
T1 Plaintiff, DeEtta O. Martin (Mother), appeals the trial court's judgment ordering Defendant, James S. Brock (Father), to pay child support only from the date of filing of Mother's petition to establish Father's paternity of the couple's child, and denying Mother attorney fees and costs. The primary issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred by failing to award child support for the five years previous to the paternity petition's filing, pursuant to 10 O.S. Supp.2000 § 88 (C)(1). In our original opinion, we found that such error had occurred,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sneed v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Humphrey v. DenneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- York v. TriggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Prudential Fire Ins. Co. v. Trave-Taylor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- State Department of Human Services Ex Rel. K.A.G. v. T.D.G.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Heustess v. Kelley-HeustessAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Gilbraith v. ClevengerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
- Heustess v. Kelley-HeustessAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Marriage of Clark v. ClarkCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
- PARSON v. FARLEYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2025