Legal Opinion
Mamot v. Board of Regents
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 22, 2010No. 08-4019-cvUnpublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff Patricio R. Mamot, pro se, appeals from the dismissal of his complaint alleging that defendants wrongfully refused to “grandfather” him into New York State’s licensing requirements for speech pathologists. We review a district court’s dismissal of a complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction de novo. See Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1); Scherer v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y, 347 F.3d 394, 397 (2d Cir.2003). In doing so, we assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and record of prior proceedings, which we reference only as necessary to explain our decision to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Frank X. Losacco v. City of Middletown, Sebastian J. Garafalo, George Aylward, Joseph Bibisi, John Chowaniec, and Relford WardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Barbara D. Scherer v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Acequip Ltd. v. American Engineering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Harrison v. New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Tiraco v. New York State Board of ElectionsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Caldwell v. PesceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Barrington v. New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Pietri v. N.Y.S. Office of Court AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.