Legal Opinion
Bair v. School District No. 141 of Smith County
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided February 6, 1915No. 18,877PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal from Smith district court; Richard M. Pick-LER, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
*145The opinion of the court was delivered by
Marshall, J.:
This is an action to recover upon a contract, the material parts of which, so far as this case is concerned, are as follows:
“This agreement, made and entered into this 23rd day of February, A. D. Nineteen Hundred and Eleven, by and between M. N. Bair, Hastings, Nebraska, Architect, party of the first part, hereinafter known as the Architect, and School District 141, Smith County, State of Kansas, Owner, party of the second part, hereinafter known as the Owner.
“Witnesseth:- That the said Architect, for and in consideration of the payments…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Babcock v. D. Deford & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Citizens' Bank v. BrighamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
- Schoen v. SunderlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
- Shepard v. M. B. Haas & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Evans v. N. B. McElfreshSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stevens v. FanningAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Spitz v. BrickhouseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
- Food Management, Inc. v. Blue Ribbon Beef Pack, Inc., Blue Ribbon Beef Pack, Inc. v. Food Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Andry & Feitel v. EwingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- Keck v. KavanaughNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.