Legal Opinion
Andry & Feitel v. Ewing
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 3, 1930No. 13,326PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
The plaintiff, an architectural firm, brings this suit against the defendant for the sum of $525 alleged to be due under a verbal contract of employment whereby plaintiff undertook to prepare certain plans and specifications for a residence for the defendant. Defendant in his answer admits the agreement and that the plans and specifications were prepared and furnished by the plaintiff, but denies liability on the ground that it was agreed and understood that the plans and specifications would be for a building not to exceed the cost of $12,000, but that the plans and specifications furnished…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Williar v. NagleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
- Horgan & Slattery v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- MacDonnell v. DreyfousSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
- Maack v. SchneiderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
- Bair v. School District No. 141 of Smith CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rosenthal v. GauthierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- Spitz v. BrickhouseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
- Bruno v. GauthierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
- Tsoi v. Ebenezer Baptist ChurchLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- Bruno v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.