Legal Opinion

Fitzpatrick Ex Rel. Fitzpatrick v. Ford

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 11, 1963No. 49713PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOUSER, Commissioner.

Action for damages by two-year-old Ronald Fitzpatrick, suing through his father and next friend, for personal injuries sustained as a result of the collapse of the roof of a porch attached to a farm house owned by defendants Cecil and Hazel Ford. A trial jury awarded plaintiff damages in the sum of $120,000. Defendants’ motion for a new trial was sustained by the trial court “because of error in the giving of instruction No. 1.” Plaintiff appealed from the order granting a new trial. § 512.020, V.A.M.S.

Plaintiff-appellant contends there was no error in giving the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kilmer v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. O'Leary v. Scullin Steel CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  3. Roman v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  4. Bartlett v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  5. Peterson v. BruneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Warren v. Paragon Technologies Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  2. Hood v. M. F. A. Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Evans v. Allen Auto Rental & Truck Leasing, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  4. Southern Missouri Bank v. FogleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. O'CONNELL v. Roper Electric Company, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API