Legal Opinion

Heckman v. Harris

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1948No. 4938PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEAUCHAMP, Superior Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment that the plaintiffs take nothing by their complaint to quiet title, and that the plaintiffs convey the premises to the defendants in accordance with the terms of certain escrow instructions. The facts are sub stantially as follows: On September 12, 1945, James J. Heckman and Ella Heck-man, his wife, appellants and plaintiffs below, owned as community property a vacant lot on East McDowell Road in the City of Phoenix. On this day Ella Heck-man, without the knowledge or consent of her husband, went with a duly authorized agent of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moore v. MeyersArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  2. City of Glendale v. CoquatArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Rundle v. WintersArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Hocking Valley Railway Co. v. BarbourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Waugh v. LennardArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. City of Tucson v. KoerberArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Evans v. MasonArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Heltzel v. Mecham PontiacArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co. v. Fluor Corp., Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API