Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. Morrison

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 19, 1954No. 525PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNy, J.

We think this appeal turns on the answers given to the following questions: (1) Was it the duty of the appellant, under the facts alleged, to inspect the gas pipes, and heaters of its customer, the Mor-Mac Motor Court, and to keep them in proper repair? (2) Where one installed a gas heater of such capacity, and supplied it with gas at such pressure, that it was capable of exhausting the oxygen in the room to the extent that the occupants thereof might suffer carbon monoxide poisoning from improper combustion of the heater, did such conduct, standing alone, constitute actionable negligence? In…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Graham v. North Carolina Butane Gas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Rulane Gas Co. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Ray v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Wilson, Jr. v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. Bryson v. Atlanta Gas Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Robles v. Shoreside Petroleum, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Lindsay ex rel. Lindsay v. Public Service Co. of North CarolinaDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1990
  3. Bradshaw v. MaidenNorth Carolina Business Court · 2015
  4. Lindsay v. Public Service Co. of N.C., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  5. Robles v. Shoreside Petroleum, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API