Legal Opinion
Weld v. Bjork
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 27, 1969No. 39861PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered upon defendants’ motion made at the conclusion of plaintiffs’ evidence.
The nine plaintiffs, in their individual rights, are the owners of nine lots in Sheridan Park, First Addition to the city of Bremerton. E. J. Bjork and his wife are the owners of three contiguous lots in the same addition.
An instrument designated “Protective Covenants,” dated October 7, 1948, was filed for record December 14; 1948,' by the owners of the addition. The covenants apply to the real property owned by all parties.
The only portion of the instrument involved…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hunter Tract Improvement Co. v. Corporation of the Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Shaffer v. Temple Beth EmethAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Struck v. KohlerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Jones v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Goldstick v. ThomasMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Green v. Normandy ParkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Green v. Normandy Park Riviera Section Community Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- White v. WilhelmCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- Sandy Point Improvement Co. v. HuberCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Bersos v. Cape George Colony ClubCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.