Legal Opinion

Goldstick v. Thomas

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1927No. Docket No. 86PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Defendants own lots 608 and 609 in Linwood Heights subdivision at the comer of Cortland and Lawton avenues, Detroit. Plaintiffs own an adjoining lot on Cortland. The lots in the subdivision, with very few exceptions, are 35 feet wide. The restrictions imposed on the lots, and to which those of the parties are subject, are, quoting in part:

“All lots, excepting those lots fronting on Linwood avenue, shall be used solely for residence purposes. No single dwelling shall be erected on any of said lots, the cost of construction of which shall be less than $3,500.
“No building shall be erected nearer…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Marrick v. FurnariMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Green v. Normandy ParkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. Green v. Normandy Park Riviera Section Community Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. Weld v. BjorkWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Covey v. GrossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Scott v. Board of Missions North Carolina Annual ConferenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API