Legal Opinion
McKim v. Porter
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 4, 1910No. 8509PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from au order of the superior court for Spokane county, Webster, J., entered October 28, 1909, in favor of the defendants, upon withdrawing the case from the consideration of the jury after a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
The only question submitted on this appeal is the character of the following judgment, whether it be one of nonsuit, or upon the merits and a bar to a subsequent action:
“This cause came regularly on for trial before the court and a jury on the 3d day of June, A. D. 1907, the plaintiff appearing in person and by counsel and the defendants ap*271pearing by their counsel. The plaintiff introduced his evidence and rested, whereupon the defendants challenged the legal sufficiency of the evidence and moved the court to decide, as a matter of law, that the defendants were and are entitled to a verdict…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morris v. WarwickWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Spokane & Idaho Lumber Co. v. LoyWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Carroll v. Grande Ronde Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Sweeney v. Frank Waterhouse & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
- Weir v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nance v. ValentineWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Alberg v. Campbell Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910