People v. Call
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DETJEN, J.
INTRODUCTION
After a jury convicted Georgette Mae Call (defendant) of transportation of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11379, subd. (a)) and possession of methamphetamine for sale {id., § 11378) (the new offenses), and after three prior prison term enhancement allegations were found true in a bifurcated court trial (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b)), those prior convictions were reduced to misdemeanors pursuant to Proposition 47, “the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act” (Proposition 47 or the Act). The reduction occurred prior to defendant’s sentencing on the new…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. RiveraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Robert L. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. Warren, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. BuycksCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018