Legal Opinion

Huening v. March Fong Eu

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1991No. C008543Published

1Opinion of the Court

231 Cal.App.3d 766 (1991)

282 Cal. Rptr. 664

TOM HUENING, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

MARCH FONG EU, as Secretary of State, etc., Defendant and Respondent; DONALD MALE, as State Printer, etc., Real Party in Interest and Respondent; TOM NOBLE et al., Real Parties in Interest and Appellants.

Docket No. C008543.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

June 25, 1991.

COUNSEL

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Remcho, Johansen & Purcell, Lowell Finley and John Lewis for Real Parties in Interest and Appellants.

John K. Van de Kamp and Daniel E. Lungren, Attorneys General, N. Eugene Hill,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  3. People v. WeidertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. PeeteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. People v. Western Fruit GrowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API