Legal Opinion

Hollis v. Tilton

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 7, 1939No. 3035PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

A majority of the court are of the opinion that no constitutional provision requires the appointment of a guardian ad litem for a decree of the probate court in the settlement of a guardian’s account to have the full force and effect of a final judgment. However, a majority are of the opinion that in the exercise of reasonable discretion one must be appointed pursuant to the statute (P. L., c. 289, s. 1) to give- the decree such character, if the ward has not meanwhile become sui juris, or has not deceased.

The defendant has offered evidence to show that a copy of each of the first three…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Magruder v. DrurySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Tripp v. GiffordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  3. Turnbull v. PomeroyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. DumaineSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  2. Maine ex rel. Fabian v. FabianSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  3. In re Guardianship of Richard A.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  4. Fleming v. AikenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API