Legal Opinion

Turnbull v. Pomeroy

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 18, 1885PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

William Turnbull is one of five partners making up the firm of William Turnbull and Company, and has forty-seven per cent of the net profits. He is also one of three trustees under the will of Theodore Pomeroy. The question submitted to us, by agreement of all parties, is whether a considerable sum paid to that firm for commissions and guaranty on sales of goods manufactured by those trustees was properly so paid, or whether the whole or some part of it ought to be accounted for as assets of the trust.

The trust is a peculiar one. The testator, after expressing his hope that one or' both of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blake v. PegramMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  2. Urann v. CoatesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. SladeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Moore v. RawsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  3. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. LewisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. Baydrop v. Second National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  5. Bridge v. BridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API