Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hardegree v. Zink

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 5, 1963No. Nos. 39567, 39568Published

1DissentJackson, Justice

The legal question for our consideration in this case is what rights, if any, does a partner or joint adventurer have when he retires, or is retired, from an active partnership or joint adventure arrangement. Also for our consideration is the factual question of whether Mr. Hardegree abandoned the joint adventure or whether he was expelled by Mr. Zink and then to discover and apply the applicable law to the facts as we find them. Additionally and finally we must determine whether Mr. Hardegree has forfeited his investment in the venture, and if not, then determine under the facts and law…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ocdike v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Forbes v. BeckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Curtin v. MoroneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Burkett v. SnakardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API