Legal Opinion

Cannefax v. Clement

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided February 2, 1990No. 890292-CAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

786 P.2d 1377 (1990)

Raymond P.L. CANNEFAX and Debra Cannefax, Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

Donald W. CLEMENT and Ruth L. Clement, Defendants and Respondents.

No. 890292-CA.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

February 2, 1990.

Rodney M. Pipella (argued), Salt Lake City, for plaintiffs and appellants.

Steven H. Lybbert (argued), Salt Lake City, for defendants and respondents.

Before BILLINGS, JACKSON and BULLOCK[1], JJ.

OPINION

BILLINGS, Judge:

Raymond and Debra Cannefax ("Cannefaxes") appeal a summary judgment entered against them in their quiet title action and in favor of Donald and Ruth Clement ("Clements").…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Ron Case Roofing & Asphalt Paving, Inc. v. BlomquistUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Carlson v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Hackford v. Utah Power & Light Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1987
  4. John Call Engineering, Inc. v. Manti City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Butler v. WilkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1987

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API