Legal Opinion
McCollough v. Johnson, Rodenberg & Lauinger
District Court, D. Montana
Decided January 8, 2009No. CV-07-166-BLG-CSOPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CAROLYN S. OSTBY, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Timothy McCollough (“McCollough”) alleges that Defendant Johnson, Rodenberg & Lauinger (“JRL”) violated federal and Montana law in its debt collection activities against him. Pending before the Court are:(1) JRL’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Court’s Doc. No. 65),(2) McCollough’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on JRL’s bona fide error defense (Court’s Doc. No. 69); and(3) Portions of McCollough’s earlier Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Court’s Doc. No. 36) on which the Court previously reserved decision. See…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Heintz v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Christ Clomon v. Philip D. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Aaron Fox Toni Fox, Husband and Wife v. Citicorp Credit Services, Inc., a South Dakota Corporation Jerold Kaplan Jane Doe Kaplan, Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- A.W. v. Preferred Platinum Plan, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Boon v. Professional Collection ConsultantsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2013