Legal Opinion

Kosiorek v. Smigelski

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 27, 2009No. AC 29477PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLYNN, C. J.

The defendant, Jacek I. Smigelski, appeals from the judgment of the trial court' granting a prejudgment remedy in favor of the plaintiff, Stanley Kosiorek, executor of the estate of Stanislaw Kosiorek (decedent). On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) found that there was probable cause to grant the prejudgment remedy, improperly taking into consideration the decision of the Probate Court, and (2) issued a prejudgment remedy in the amount of $54,833.33 without taking into consideration any potential defenses or counterclaims. We affirm the judgment of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ledgebrook Condominium Assn., Inc. v. Lusk CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  2. Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, P.C. v. BeckettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  3. TES FRANCHISING, LLC v. FeldmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  4. Union Trust Co. v. HeggelundSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Rafferty v. Noto Bros. Construction, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cohen v. ROLL-A-COVER, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  2. Bridgeport Harbour Place I, LLC v. GanimConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  3. Rossman v. MorascoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  4. General Electric Capital Corp. of Puerto Rico v. RizviConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  5. Crotty v. Tuccio Development, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API