Legal Opinion
In re Dial Complete Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided December 8, 2015No. Case No. 11-md-2263-SMPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*46ORDER
Steven J. McAuliffe, United States District Judge
This consolidated, multi-district litigation is brought by consumers in Arkansas, California, Florida, Illinois, Louisiana, Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin, on behalf of themselves and similarly situated consumers in those states. Plaintiffs say that defendant, The Dial Corporation (“Dial”), continually misrepresented the antibacterial properties of its “Dial Complete” branded soaps. They advance claims under their respective state consumer protection/unfair trade practices statutes, as well as statutory and common law causes of action for…
2Cases cited125 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Doe I v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hughes v. Ester C Co., NBTYDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Emily Fitzmorris, et al. v. New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services Commissioner Lori Weaver, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023
- Derick Ortiz, v. Sig Sauer, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020
- Robert W. Clough, II on behalf of himself and other similarly situated v. Revenue Frontier, LLC et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2019
- Belezos v. Board of Selectmen of Hingham, MassachusettsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.