Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. Bristol Laboratories, Division of Bristol-Myers Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 23, 1978PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Hopkins, J. P.

The narrow question before us is whether the three-year Statute of Limitations (CPLR 214, subd 5), or the four-year Statute of Limitations (Uniform Commercial Code, § 2-725) applies to a cause of action to recover damages for personal injuries arising from a breach of warranty.

Special Term held that the four-year limitation under the Uniform Commercial Code was the controlling provision and denied the defendants’ motions to dismiss that cause of action. We concur and affirm the order insofar as it has been appealed from.

*198I

The plaintiff Evelyn McCarthy was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Micallef v. Miehle Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  3. Campo v. ScofieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Victorson v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Perlmutter v. Beth David HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1954

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cubito v. KreisbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Johnson v. Hockessin Tractor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  3. McCarthy v. Bristol Laboratories, Division of Bristol-Myers CoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. T & N PLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  5. Doyle v. Happy Tumbler Wash-O-Mat, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API