Legal Opinion

McCartney Et Ux. v. Hyman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 26, 1938No. Appeals, 172 and 192PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

Appellants, husband and wife, brought an action in trespass against Dr. David A. Hyman and Dr. Dennis H. Simmerman to recover the damages suffered by them respectively because of the alleged negligent professional treatment which the defendants, who are practicing dentists, separately gave the wife plaintiff.

Verdicts were rendered in favor of the husband for $650 and the wife for $1350, and against the defendants in the amount of $1000 each.

The court entered judgments non obstante veredicto in favor of the defendants. Plaintiffs appealed, the husband’s appeal being to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Duckworth v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Cleary v. Quaker City Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Remley v. PlummerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. McCandless v. McWhaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
  5. Moscicki Et Ux. v. ShorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bierstein v. WhitmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Emich v. Boggs & Buhl, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API