Legal Opinion

Moscicki Et Ux. v. Shor

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1932No. Appeal 188 and 189PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion- by

Parker, J.,

This is an action in trespass by the plaintiffs, husband and wife, against the defendant, a dentist, to recover damages alleged to have been occasioned by the removal of twenty-three teeth of the wife, Josephine Moscieki. The case having been submitted to a jury, separate verdicts were rendered for plaintiffs, when motions were made for judgment n. o. v. and for a new trial, both of which were refused by the court below. The defendant in its appeal assigns as error the refusal to grant such motions.

The plaintiff offered evidence which tended to show that Josephine…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Staloch v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. Miller v. TolesMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Williams v. LeBarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  4. Remley v. PlummerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Patten v. WigginSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1862

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Gray v. GrunnagleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Smith v. YoheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Hodgson v. BigelowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Cooper v. RobertsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Donaldson v. MaffucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API