Legal Opinion

Heyman v. Linwood Park

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 14, 1956PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

41 N.J. Super. 437 (1956)

125 A.2d 345

LLOYD HEYMAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

LINWOOD PARK, INC., SECTION FOUR, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 5, 1956.

Decided September 14, 1956.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.

Mr. Charles E. Villanueva argued the cause for the defendant-appellant (Messrs. Van Riper & Belmont, attorneys; Mr. Walter D. Van Riper and Mr. Eugene Tighe, of counsel).

No appearance for, nor brief filed by, the plaintiff-respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, J.A.D.

The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Morris v. KettleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
  2. McCrory Stores Corp. v. S. M. Braunstein, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  3. Muller v. BeckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
  4. Hecklau v. HauserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
  5. Heckel v. GrieseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Westmount Country Club v. KamenyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  2. In the Matter of the Plywood Company of Pennsylvania, the Plywood Company of Pennsylvania, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  3. Weiss v. I. Zapinsky, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  4. Burns v. Westamerica Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  5. Gottdiener v. MailhotNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API