Legal Opinion

Morris v. Kettle

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1894PublishedCited by 17 opinions

On rule to show cause. Certified from the Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Depue, J.

This action was in contract upon a covenant contained in a lease for the recovery of rent for thirteen months. By a lease in writing and under seal, dated February, 1891, the plaintiff demised to the defendant certain premises for the term of five years from February 1st, 1891. It was admitted that the rent from September 1st, 1892, to October 1st, 1893, had not been paid. The defence was that the defendant had been evicted by the plaintiff from a part of the demised premises before any of the unpaid rent became due. In debt for rent under the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lewis v. PaynNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  2. Colburn v. MorrillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. Smith v. Wise, Stigleman & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Southern Pacific R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Talbott v. EnglishIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Kuschinsky v. FlaniganMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Meeker v. SpalsburySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
  5. Burnstine v. MarguliesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API