Legal Opinion
Gottdiener v. Mailhot
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 10, 1981PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
179 N.J. Super. 286 (1981)
431 A.2d 851
ALEXANDER GOTTDIENER AND ERNEST GOTTDIENER, PARTNERS, T/A OAKWOOD VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
PAUL N. MAILHOT AND JANET M. MAILHOT, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 2, 1981.
Decided June 10, 1981.
Before Judges MICHELS, KOLE and ARD.
Philip B. Vinick argued the cause for appellants (Weltchek, Prupis & Ritz, attorneys).
David C. Pennella argued the cause for respondents (Hugh E. DeFazio, Jr., attorney).
The opinion of the court was delivered by KOLE, J.A.D.
The primary question on this appeal is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Trentacost v. BrusselSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Reste Realty Corporation v. CooperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Berzito v. GambinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Blackett v. OlanoffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Echo Consulting Services, Inc. v. North Conway BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Bocchini v. Gorn Management Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Casa Blanca Mobile Home Park v. HillNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Nottingham Associates v. ChristianRichmond County Circuit Court · 1992