Etchepare v. Ehmke
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
On June 7, 1954, pursuant to a telephone conversation with defendant’s counsel, plaintiff’s attorney phoned the clerk for a trial date, prepared a stipulation “that the above entitled matter now off calendar subject to being reset 30 days from March 31, 1954, be set for trial September 22, 1954, at 9:15 a. m. in Department 1 of the above entitled court, without prejudice to either party, ’ ’ and forwarded it to defendants' attorney for his signature. On June 11th, the signed stipulation was received by plaintiff’s attorney with a covering letter from defendants’ counsel. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Benjamin v. Dalmo Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Shearman v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Bruskey v. BruskeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Caton v. CatonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
3Cited by8 opinions
- Luz v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Kendall v. BarkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Price v. HibbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Flores v. Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Bird v. McGuireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.