Legal Opinion

Etchepare v. Ehmke

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 5, 1955No. Civ. 21217PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

On June 7, 1954, pursuant to a telephone conversation with defendant’s counsel, plaintiff’s attorney phoned the clerk for a trial date, prepared a stipulation “that the above entitled matter now off calendar subject to being reset 30 days from March 31, 1954, be set for trial September 22, 1954, at 9:15 a. m. in Department 1 of the above entitled court, without prejudice to either party, ’ ’ and forwarded it to defendants' attorney for his signature. On June 11th, the signed stipulation was received by plaintiff’s attorney with a covering letter from defendants’ counsel. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Benjamin v. Dalmo Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Shearman v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Bruskey v. BruskeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Caton v. CatonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Luz v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Kendall v. BarkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Price v. HibbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Flores v. Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Bird v. McGuireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API